Thursday, March 13, 2014

Feminism VS Rape Porn / Degrading Sex

http://efukt.com/21134_The_Duke_University_Feminist_Pornstar.html

Hilarious clip.

I can't answer for her views on feminism, but I can with certainty say that there is no contradiction in being a feminist and enjoying rape-fantasies or degrading sex. Feminism is the belief that men and women deserve equal opportinities in life and that gender shouldn't be an obstacle for your individuality. It doesn't have a god damn thing to do with what kind of sex you like and what profession you choose, other than supporting your choice in all of these things. Whether a woman wants to be a housewife or a pornstar, feminism supports that, because that is what she wants to do.

Of course a lot of people misinterpret that, even "feminists" themselves, though I don't like to call those people feminists. I call them "feminazis". Because you really do have to be a fascist fucking moron to say: "I DON'T LIKE BEING SLAPPED DURING SEX SO THAT MEANS NOBODY ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD COULD ENJOY IT EITHER."

Sex isn't a bad thing. There are many ways you can have it, and as long as it occurs on terms that both consenting parties agree are the best - no matter WHAT those terms are - Then voila, there isn't a fucking problem. Equality doesn't mean that everyone needs to be ONE certain way, it means diversity and respecting each others differences.

I also see a lot of people who think that "feminism" means that you aren't allowed to pick girls up. Why are people so fucking retarded? What the fuck kind of moron would get it into their head that "equality" is the same thing as "being a pussy with no balls"? Of course feminism is against the notion of cat-calling. Why? Because it's fucking retarded, rude and isn't picking someone up, it's harassment. Telling a complete stranger "nice tits" isn't picking someone up either, it's sexual harassment. And grabbing someones body parts when you don't know them really god damn well is harassment too.

But getting to know someone, getting a good vibe going, and asking them if they want to have sex when it feels like the right time: that's just what the fuck you do. I don't see how that defies the notion of equality.




Friday, January 17, 2014

Facebook: A Brave New World of Masturbation

Ive gotten the impression that there might be girls on this planet who DONT think that all of the pictures theyve uploaded on Facebook/Instagram/Whatever have been jacked off to.

I don't understand why such a naive notion would even cross their mind. Nor do I understand how such a thing could even be possible. There is no doubt that almost every single picture that you have uploaded of yourself has been jacked off to. Some girls upload pictures of themselves making ugly faces, so that's why I said "almost". However, there is no doubt that someone might have jacked off to that picture, because even ugly/jokeful faces can be used in a fantasy. I recall jacking off to one girl who had uploaded a picture of herself shooting her toungue out in order to make herself look silly. However noble her intentions, there was nothing silly about that picture as it was the perfect one for me to envision her licking my dick.

Do you think that we would rather be looking at porn? Of course pornography is delightful. However, personally, I rather enjoy subjects that you have some kind of a relationship to, even if it is the most shallow one. It allows you to create more immersive fantasies, and depending on the subject it can also be quite thrilling to jack off to someone you know you shouldn't be jacking off to.
In either case it is not always that you are brainless-horny and just want to jack off to anything nude so you throw on a porno. Sometimes the masturbation-connoisseur requires something a bit more refined, something that is a bit more stimulating for your mental landscape, if you will. Pictures do indeed allow us to work our brains more.

A picture of your body is enough. Take a girl that you know: Facebook creates a visual catalogue of her body. She takes pictures of herself posing in various attires, sometimes revealing, sometimes not. It is not absolutely necessary to be revealing: A simple dress could be enough to catch a glimpse of her shapes, and if she is wearing tight clothes it is only all the better. But even with this luxury that they offer us, some go as far as uploading vacation-photos! Oh lord, sweet Lucifer, there is nothing more delightful than vacation-photos - Those are truly the gold-mine of Facebook-jacking. The privilege of the wealthy.
But we don't even need that much. Do you females not realize what we can do with a picture of your face? Do you think that we dream about shooting loads on pictures of your lunch, or motivational pictures about being the best version of yourself? Surely the female side of the species can't be so naive? One picture is all that's required to defile you in our minds.

I recall an occasion a couple of months ago. I decided to look up one of my old teachers on Facebook. I didn't have her added as a friend so her profile was somewhat restricted, you could only see a couple of pictures. But that's all I needed... I simply blocked out her child that was sitting nearby and focused on her luscious hair and gorgeous lips.

Girls. Even the pictures that you don't think are sexy whatsoever - They will be used.

And I know Im not the only one.



Thursday, January 16, 2014

Song About Sex

Stabbing Westward - Inside You

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6PrRUQMUsE

This is the only song I can think of which takes the subject of "INTERCOURSE" and actually gives it substance. There are a lot of songs about sex out there, particularly mainstream-pop and rap, but it's always hollow and superficial. Stabbing Westward is not.

The build-up of the instrumentals is similar to an intercourse itself: It starts out tingling, slowly it moves forward and forward, to finally result in a powerful climax; The orgasm, timed to and completed by the lyrics. Christopher Hall is a genius for making this.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

Saw a new shrink a few days ago.

I got a new shrink. She told me that during her 17-year long career she has never met someone with my kind of attitude. And by that, she means: "I have never met someone who questions my expertise as much as you do" and my overall "judgmental tendencies towards people" and "arrogance". I told her that me being judgmental is completely justified because I would rather have good taste and high standards than to settle for shit, and that she is the arrogant one who thinks she knows so much more than I do.

Seriously, what kind of mindless fucks has she been seeing for 17 years that don't even question her statements and methods? Do people seriously go to a shrink and expect them to know what they're talking about? They aren't an actual expert, they are just another human being. And what does that mean? That means that if you take one patient and give them five different shrinks, they're all gonna come up with different theories and different "flaws" that the patient needs to change about themselves. Being educated doesn't excempt you from human nature and the subjectivity of reality.

See, they got an education so they know shit you're too lazy to research, and you're supposed to use them as a library. You aren't supposed to use them as a religion and put your entire fucking life in their hands. They are a tool, not a messiah. You're supposed to go see a shrink with a critical mindset, you're not supposed to swallow whatever the fuck they tell you. Because it is through a critical mindset that you actually use your brain, think and can find out what really is true. If you don't have a critical mindset then you're just like any other Christian/Muslim/Hindu/Buddhist/whatever.

Afterwards it dawned on me that without her even realizing it, she gave me a compliment.

Friday, November 22, 2013

The 20th of November.

People generally don't give a shit about birthdays. They see it as an occasion where you are supposed to give someone something “just cuz”. They see it as something commercial. They don't see the purpose in birthdays, they don't want to be given gifts because “Oh Im not anything special” and they don't seem to want to give others gifts because "I don't know what to give". They see it, more than anything, as a formality that needs to be endured.

I, on the other hand, see it as the only special occasion worth celebrating. I don't believe in any kind of God or other false idols, I don't believe in blind admiration for authority and I most certainly do not believe that fictional books written by misogynist fag-bashing humans thousands of years ago contain the ultimate knowledge about reality. All religions are nonsense to me.
However, I do “celebrate” Bajram/Ramadan because my family is Muslim. But I don't actually believe in what it is that we are gathering over. I simply like the gathering. And since it means a lot to my mother, who I love, I join in on it. That's all there is to it. It is shallow, in the sense that I only like the company and don't actually give a shit about why we decided to spend time together that day.

But birthdays are different. Because a birthday is much deeper than that. A birthday actually bears some kind of meaning, because that is the day that a particular person was born. A birthday is a celebration of that individual. You are celebrating the fact that they are alive and what they mean to you. And if you give a shit about someone you make sure to take that seriously. A birthday is not something trivial and it most certainly isn't the same as “any other kind of holiday”. Because all other holidays are based on superstition and ridiculous ideas. Friendship is not something ridiculous. Individuality is not something ridiculous. Those are things that are very fucking real to you and they exists in your day-to-day life. 
It is something that you can touch. God is not. 
It is something that you should embrace and praise. God is not.
The value of your loved ones far surpasses everything else, especially make-believe fairytales about how human beings were created and what their purpose is as slaves for the evil overlord who created them.

A friend of mine once said: "I don't see the point in showing appreciation for someone on a specific day, you should show it on every day." It is a good and noble point. But still a completely fucking retarded thing to say when you're an atheist who celebrates Christmas simply because your surroundings expect you to. >__> If you reason in that manner then you should completely refrain from all holidays and special occasions simply because they are what they are, and instead make an effort to bring people together at random times throughout the year and give everyone gifts. But you don't do that. I don't think anyone does. Because it isn't practical, it's a fucking pain in the ass, and it doesn't even make any sense. Human beings need routine. And not to mention, that nigga hardly gives me "Congratulations!" cards on random days throughout the year and gifts to go along with them so he isn't even living up to his own rationale. It's just something he shat out when confronted on why he doesn't care about birthdays. It wasn't reasonable and it wasn't thought-out.

The fact of the matter is simply that you weren't born on every single day of the year. You were born on one particular day. That day is the occasion when you successfully was brought into this world. The day you truly became alive. And the point isn't that you AREN'T supposed to be kind and generous towards the person every other day of the year. The point is that this is THAT particular day when the person was born, and it only makes sense to celebrate such a thing. That's the keyword: Celebration. It is the ritual. It is the symbolism in the celebration; a birthday is directly connected to the persons value. You don't show that kind of extra attention any other day of the year and nobody could ask that of you either, because it would be a complete pain in the ass and expensive as fuck. So it only makes sense to have one particular day where everything can be focused to make the person feel special. Because if they mean something to you they deserve that.

Monday, November 18, 2013

LETS RAPE SOMEONE BECAUSE OF A GAME

Hi. This is Anita Sarkeesian. A feminist who is tired of the way video-games are made: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/566429325/tropes-vs-women-in-video-games

Apparently, because of her Kickstarter campaign, this woman has gotten her YouTube-channel spammed with violent comments, people have created an internet-meme where they photoshop sperm and bruises on her face, hacked her website, called her home to issue rape threats and her adress has also been posted online with the implication that horrible things would happen to her if she persisted with her project.

And that's what we call systematic misogyny. You see, there's nothing wrong with thinking that she is stupid. I think that she is stupid. Im a feminist and I don't think there is any sense in what she is saying whatsoever, one of the "sexist stereotypes" she listed in her campaign-video is Bayonetta which is one of my favourite games. The storyline and gameplay is trippy as FUCK and the protagonist is both sexy, strong and awesome. If that isn't a positive female image I don't know what is. What the fuck is the problem with a woman looking good? O__o So a woman needs to be ugly in order to be a feminist archetype? That's absolutely ridiculous. Feminism is about equality, it doesn't have a god damn thing to do with beauty. Beauty is subjective and your personal taste decides what you find appealing. I admit that the beauty standards in society are shit but that's because they are simple-minded. Not because they are wrong. I like curvy girls, fat girls, thin girls, goths, blondes, whatever. If you're hot you're hot. The problem with beauty-standards is that there isn't any diversity. Not that they are necessarily wrong.

So no, I don't agree with that woman. I don't have a problem with the video-game industry. But you don't see me making comments threatening to beat and rape her, or that it would be a good thing if that happened, or saying that she needs to die, or calling her house, or giving out her adress. The way people are reacting is fucking disgusting, they are forming a god damn hate-mob similar to what you would see in old Frankenstein-movies over a girl WHO DOESN'T FUCKING LIKE THE WAY VIDEO-GAMES ARE MADE. FOR FUCK SAKE. HOW DOES THAT WARRANT RAPE? WHAT'S THE FUCKING DISASTER HERE? IT'S NOT LIKE SHE HURT ANYONE, HER FUCKING OPINION DIFFERS, THAT'S ALL THERE IS TO IT.

I don't understand the problem. Let her make her fucking game and the people who think it's appealing will buy it and enjoy it, just like any other game which is created. How is that a disaster? And if you say something like "IT WILL BRAINWASH PEOPLE INTO BECOMING MANHATERS" you seriously deserve a fucking sledgehammer in your face, because that's exactly what you are hating that woman for saying. Anita's entire argument is that the "negative stereotypes" in video-games enforce a negative view towards women. If you don't agree with her on that, then why the fuck would you care whether or not she makes her game with a different kind of protagonist?

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Buffalo Bill ~ Fan poem by Teryo Law




He was looking into the pit in his basement where "it" was lying, but at the same time he was looking deep into the pit of his own soul. A place where different dreams and desires once used to lie, the kind that every common man could relate to.. The desire to be wanted. The desire to belong somewhere. The desire to be loved. Feelings, put simply, that every person takes for granted. And dreams. The dream to achieve something in life.

But these things were not tangible anymore, it was not something that you can touch and call your own. No, "feelings" simply became an abstract concept. I mean sure, some kind of emotions and needs existed in this man but they had been distorted into something that most human beings would not recognize, something that they would never label as their own kind. His "human" dreams and desires had been rinsed away through many years of callous violence, by the very two people whose duty it was to guide a child towards basic humanity through themselves, their failure shaping a person whose very connection to humanity itself became tattered to shreds.

His dream became something that most people can't relate to. Buffalo Bill did not want to be an engineer. He did not want to be an astronaut. He simply wanted to be human. And the only way that he could become human would be to wear a suit made out of the skin of tortured women. And as far as his desires are concerned, well... They had now been building up for the last couple of minutes and finally shaped into one big single eager yearning that simply could not wait any longer: "PUT THE FUCKING LOTION IN THE BASKET!!!"




Sunday, October 6, 2013

WOMEN SECRETLY WANT TO BE RAPED





























I came across a recently published article about how a LOT of women secretly fantasize about being raped. Of course, this is nothing new to me because I've had a rape fetish since I was 12 years old and almost every girl I have been with has enjoyed domination in some way or another. As a person who enjoys rape when it comes to the fantasy but would NEVER dream of raping someone in real life, I can relate to those women. And I already understand. I understand that they enjoy the fantasy of being dominated by someone they want to have sex with. Like a hot young Antonio Banderas-looking type who does exactly all the right things. They don't fantasize about the trauma and hundreds of hours spent in therapy sessions to get over the demeaning exploitation by a drunken frat boy who thinks he's hot shit.

And so, when reading the comments, I start wishing that the end of the world is near because apparently people are so unimaginably stupid that this human race is completely fucking hopeless and will NEVER get better. What evidence do I have of this?

Comments like this that flood the field of responses to the article:

Number one: I pointed out this study to some feminists, and they all shrieked the same thing: “Fantasy is different from reality!!”.
That’s their story, and they’re sticking to it.
If fantasy is different from reality... then why don't women ever have fantasies about soft, sensitive lovemaking with a beta herb shuffling papers in his cubicle?
Game, set, match.


Number two: I sometimes read about women who have been raped having trouble enjoying sex after that experience. I wonder if it is because it can never live up to the intensity of that experience.

Number three: (A person simply linked this) http://www.yourtango.com/experts/lucia/12-reasons-women-can-t-stand-nice-guys

Number four: Feminists can kiss my ass. Being a nice guy got me nothing. Got me a divorce. Being a marginally jerky guy who demanded and took and gave back when women earned it got me laid more than I ever dreamed in my pathetic beta fantasies.
The lies women tell themselves about themselves.
Answer me that, feminist self-delusionals.

Number five: Yeah you when I read feminists attempting to broaden the definition of rape to include “coercion” or going on about “rape culture” I can’t help but think they doth protest too much! Much like conservative politicians who seem obsessed with homosexuality and then turn out to be gay themselves, I think it’s a definite possibility that the readership at Shakespeare’s sister are women who have rape fantasies but are in the closet/in denial about it. Sickos! 

Number six: It does lend an interesting twist to the take back the night marchers. The majority of them are not merely concerned with rape, they are sexually fantasizing about getting raped.
Makes you wonder if their marches are so much about political power as fear of their own inner natures. Project outwards onto men what you can not accept as your inner female desire.

And those are only a few. So let me just summarize everything you'll find in the comments-field very briefly: "OH, WOW, REALLY? MOST WOMEN HAVE RAPE FANTASIES? WELL GOSH, THAT MUST MEAN THAT THEY WOULD ENJOY BEING RAPED IN REAL LIFE. CUZ EVERYTHING YOU THINK, YOU WANT TO CARRY OUT IN REAL LIFE. AND VIDEO GAMES MAKE PEOPLE SHOOT UP SCHOOLS."

FOR FUCK SAKE. YOU GOD DAMN IDIOTS.

The comments are full of
1. Absolutely ignorant people who apparently have never had a sexual fantasy in their entire life and reason like the soccer-moms after Columbine who blamed Marilyn Manson.
2. Pathetic men who say shit like "YEAH BEING A NICE GUY GETS ME NOWHERE SO OBVIOUSLY THIS PROVES THE POINT, YOU HAVE TO BE A RAPIST TO GET SOMEWHERE IN LIFE. DAMN YOU FEMINISTS FOR ASKING ME TO RESPECT BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS."

Is there anything more pathetic than a man who is bitter because he acted nice towards a woman and didn't get to fuck her? Because apparently every person that you do something nice towards owes you sex. Wow. And people call ME demented?

You know, REAL kindness is self-less. Not selfish. People who are ACTUALLY and GENUINELY nice do nice things simply because it is the right thing to do, not because they expect anything in return. So my guess (which is undoubtebly the right one) is that all of those bitter pathetic fucks claiming to be "heart-broken nice guys" are just wimpy assholes who thought that buying something for a woman would guarantee them having sex. Or maybe you hoped that becoming friends with a woman and listening to all of her problems would make her interested in you eventually.
* Despite the fact that what you are doing is the NORMAL thing to be doing if you are friends with someone; Friends listen to each other and support each other. You don't want to start fucking your female friends because they help you out when shit is rough so why would you want to start fucking male ones? It's not romantic. It's not special. It's just what friends do for each other. But you've never had a female friend in your entire life because you see them as "the other side of the species" rather than human beings, so you think that listening to a persons problems is a "pick-up move". No wonder nobody wants to fuck you. You're an idiot.
* Despite the fact that your intentions are disgusting and ingenuine. You're not becoming friends with her and listening to her because you actually care, you're doing it because you're thinking it will land you into a relationship at the end. And guess what that is? That is manipulation, whether you are aware of it or not. It is fake. Phoney. It is not real. Why would a woman be interested in someone who isn't real? My guess is that most people who claim that they have been a "nice guy" weren't a nice guy. They were a fucking wimp with shallow intentions.

Number seven: so 90% of them find it erotic, but they won’t hesitate to lock a guy away for 40 years when he gives them what they want?

These absolute fucking MORONS can't even grasp the simple fundamental nature of a sexual fantasy. It is incredibly disappointing for me to think that these are grown men who have finished SCHOOL and don't know THE SLIGHTEST FUCKING THING about;
1. Rape.
2. Sexuality.
Let me educate every one of you and make the world a better place. Ignore the fact that you all just got rightfully served as the idiots that you are and just listen to me, because in doing such you might stop being a dumbass. And also, what I say can't be denied because logic and science is on my side.

Ah-he-HEM!

You have to understand the nature of a sexual fantasy. A person might become aroused when they fantasize about being raped and not being in control, but when fantasizing about it they are always fully in control because they can decide to leave at any point if it were to take an unwanted turn. (And that is the function of "safewords" in things like BDSM and Rapeplay) The fantasy is theirs: They choose what to experience and even if their choice means to completely give up their freedom of choice momentarily, everything is still on their terms. But when it comes to actual rape, nothing is on their terms. That is the definition of rape: Sex against someone's will. A fantasy where you are dominated by a person that you desire is not against your will. So no. Fantasizing about rape doesn't mean that you actually want to be raped.

The fact that someone thinks about something doesn't say anything about what they truly want, because the gap between fantasy and reality is just that huge. Reality has a ton of different aspects that fantasy doesn't have. And it works the same way for fantasizing about yourself being the rapist: You might find the idea of rape to be sexually arousing but it doesn't have anything to do with your morals in real life. In your mind, the fantasy has no limits and affects only yourself. You're free to play around in there. In real life, it has consequences. Not only for other people but also for yourself. Your empathy and your conscience wouldn't make it an enjoyable experience. And thus it becomes something completely different from what you imagined. Something undesirable. When it comes to actually doing it in real life, you're just not that interested. Nobody is hurt in your imagination but people are hurt in real life. What appeals to you in your mind doesn't necessarily appeal to you in real life, as is the case with any fantasy. You could be in a relationship with a delightful woman and find the sex to be great, but when you masturbate you think about her mother or her sister. Does that mean that you want to cheat on her? No. Because there is a difference between fantasy and reality. You have no problem thinking about fucking her relatives because it's harmless and has no consequences. But doing it? This is where the difference with reality comes into play: You wouldn't do it in real life because you love your partner and wouldn't want to do anything to betray and hurt them. There is a difference between fantasy and reality. And that difference simply depends on what is the fantasy, and what is the reality.

Last but not least: Women who fantasize about rape don't actually want to be raped. They want to be dominated by someone of their choice. In a rape fantasy a woman gets to be ravished by a man she finds desirable without having to feel any responsibility for what happens. She cannot be blamed for fucking a guy her friends or family might not approve of. She cannot be considered a slut for fucking a guy she just met and whose name she does not know. She does not need to find a logical reason for her feelings. She doesn’t need to reconcile her desire for the handsome cad with her intellectual understanding that he’s totally unsuitable for any long term relationship. It is just pure freedom from accountability and pure focus on pleasure.

You have to understand that with the norms in society, women are blamed for their sexuality all the time. And when it comes to appearence and reputation they are constantly forced to be "responsible" and keep track of everything that they do, much more so than men. So the only time that they can feel "free", really, is when they are having sex and let the man control everything. They no longer have to think about norms. They no longer have to think about being "neat and lady-like". They no longer have to think about being quiet when the men are talking. And therein lies the appeal of being dominated: Freedom from any kind of responsibility. Pure pleasure.

Of course, Im not saying that is the case for all women. The degree to which women like to be dominated varies with everything from "zero" to "full on rapeplay". There are girls who don't find it to be exciting whatsoever. But I am saying that for the ones who do enjoy it, the text above explains why.

So don't be a fucking idiot and blindly assume that girls want to be man-handled because "it's in their nature as the submissive side of the species". Unless you've had a very elaborate conversation about what sexual preferences you both have before you ever have sex, "No" still means "No". And a doubtful look is still a doubtful look. Which brings us to the importance of consent: Just because a lot of women enjoy being dominated doesn't mean that they enjoy it at all possible times. Asking someone loud and clear: "Do you wanna do this?" before you start having sex on each and every occasion should be a regulated law for any kind of sexual intercourse, even vanilla-sex. Not just something rarely corteous that "paranoid" guys do.



Friday, September 20, 2013

Marilyn Manson is Washed Up

Anyone who is a Manson fan should be familiar with the following words: " I realized that you can't change the world. You can only change yourself. "

That's what he learned after "Antichrist Superstar". It's pretty obvious to me that Marilyn Manson started out as an intelligent idealistic young man who was extremely dissatisfied with the world human beings have created for themselves. So he sought to destroy the world and all the skewed values of society, in order to make it a better place. That was the mission of his music.That was his original motivation. He wanted to make people start thinking because he recognized that people are idiots.

But eventually he realized that you can't change the world. It doesn't matter how smart you are. It doesn't matter how smart your fans are. Most people are dumbasses and they are going to stay that way. You can't change the world unless everyone else wants to change it with you. And most people don't. They are too afraid. They are too locked in their habits. They are too big sheep. They just want to fit in and have the easy comfortable life. Because being an individual and standing up for yourself is a certain path to being hated by many, as well as adored by many, but most people simply can't handle the hatred.

Maybe they are stupid, or maybe they have the gift of intelligence but throw it away because thinking for yourself is just too frightening. I don't know how conscious they are of being sheeps. But you look at that, you look at the fact that most human beings just want to conform, and then you look at the fact that the world is governed by big businesses and people who need to sell fear. How could you possibly make a difference in this oppressive system that is society?

I think that is what Manson realized. Most human beings are shit. They have always been shit and they will always be shit. You can't save the world by being a rockstar. You can only affect your place in it. And change your own outlook on things in order to be able to feel content with life.
And that's when the theme of the albums started being about him, rather than society. That's when the albums started being more about channeling his emotions about things in his life, than social commentary.

There are so many people saying that he isn't "relevant" anymore. Well... That's because he doesn't make music about society anymore. And how the fuck could you possibly expect him to? He has said everything that there is to be said about that. Why would he be repeating himself with everything that everyone already knows? Do we seriously need someone to tell us that Religion is retarded? Do we seriously need someone to tell us that censorship is bullshit? Are you people so god damn stupid that you can't figure that out on your own?

Don't you think that when someone makes the headlines for years on end because of their war against Christianity, they get fucking fed up with talking about Christianity? You have said what you have to say. Your opinion on the matter is very clear. Of course you don't want to repeat yourself and be stuck in the same fucking rut. There is no fucking point in talking about something that you don't like when your opinion on it is abundantly clear and you know that you simply can't change any more than you already have tried to change. You want to evolve. You want to experience new things.

I don't think it's the least bit surprising that Manson gave up on the world considering that his "fans" are so fucking stupid they can't even make sure to spread the message of individuality by themselves, instead they have to rely on HIM to keep saying "smart" things and putting the message out there and being a smart person. They couldn't possibly be inspired by the artist to make a positive change in the world. No, they just want him there as someone to channel all their issues with the world through music so they get a means to ventilate and never have to actually DO anything themselves. Never have to take any fucking responsibility themselves, before they move to suburbia in order to live a normal life and adapt to society because "that's what all the normal people do anyway, there is no other way out." They are fucking dumbasses and they are fucking cowards.

All Marilyn Manson ever wanted to do was to make people think for themselves and have the balls to be themselves, that's what it always was. It wasn't shock value for the sake of shock value and he wasn't pretending to relate to young people in order to sell records. His intentions were always genuine.
But instead he turned into a product for teenage angst. Not because he ever wanted to be a product. No. It's because people always wanted him to be a stereotype. They wanted him to be a certain way. They wanted him to say all the shit they don't have the balls to say out loud. They don't want him to be a human being. They don't want him to do anything else and to show other facets of his personality.

The reason why I decided to write this article is because I was looking through Manson's album reviews on Amazon.com just for the hell of it and I came across one that was reviewing his latest album: Born Villain. One reviewer made such ridiculous statements as:

" After 2003's The Golden Age Of Grotesque was released my appreciation for the band had started to wane. It felt as if Manson had moved from being the creepy musical genius to a commercial rock star. It just seemed as if the shock and awe factor that made the band so great in the the 1990's had gave way to a generic industrial rock band in the early 2000's. "

And by "creepy genius" I assume he means "a person who is always pissing someone off". I seriously don't understand how these fucking people reason. Manson has always had an idea for every record that he made.
Antichrist Superstar was about Hate, Misanthropy and the bullshit of society.
Mechanical Animals was about Isolation and Fame.
Holy Wood was about American Culture, The Media and Celebrities As Heroes.
Golden Age of Grotesque was a celebration of Goth Fashion and Freaks.
Eat Me Drink Me was about Broken Love.
High End of Low is about Depression and might possibly be the most "horrible" album he has done because you can quite clearly tell how enormously shitty he feels.

And you mean to tell me that this fucking person isn't an ARTIST who expresses himself? It is very clear to me that he has a thought-out idea for every album he does and a meaning behind the songs, but since people are jackasses they will label it as "HE'S NOT A GENIUS ANYMORE BECAUSE HE DOESN'T PISS PEOPLE OFF".

They just want one thing and they want it to be the same thing that Manson started out doing: Criticizing society and taking a shit on religion. When he isn't criticizing society, he isn't a "genius" anymore. When he isn't repeating himself, he isn't a "genius" anymore. Well, I don't need "shock and awe" in order to appreciate good, meaningful music. It really makes me ponder how someone can say those things out loud without even having the slightest fucking bit of self-distance to realize what they are actually saying: I CAN'T LIKE SOMETHING IF OTHER PEOPLE AREN'T UPSET BY IT.

" I was just about ready to give this album up without listening to it when I heard No Reflection on my way to college. It was as if I was hearing someting that would have came out during the Mechanical Animals era. Oh, it didn't blow me away like some of the better Manson numbers had, but it defintely brought back the nostalgia. It brought me back to the days that I was the run of the mill misunderstood youth trying to find my place in the world. "

I can't believe that this fucking dumbass would STEREOTYPE HIMSELF. >_> "I was a standard issue misunderstood young person!" Jesus fucking christ! You describe yourself as a charactiture rather than a human being with their own personality. You talk about being unhappy with the world as if it's some kind of a damn product!

LOOK. To expect Marilyn Manson to make another record about religion would be a damn insult to the artist that he is. I can't believe that I have to say the most redundant fact of all that everyone seems to have missed out on, but HE IS A HUMAN BEING. As such, he has different sides to his personality. And expecting someone to do the same thing over and over, say the same thing over and over, be the same person over and over, is just god damn absurd. Everyone evolves, either get with it or fuck off already. It's absolutely fucking ridiculous that you have fans who expect an artist to keep being the same person they were 20 years ago.

I don't particularly like Born Villain. It has a few songs that are just fucking awesome, but I feel it has dull songs too and an overall dull sound. But you know what? That's all that I can say. Im not gonna make some ridiculous fucking assumption about how "HE'S ONLY DOING MUSIC TO SELL RECORDS NOW DUDE ITS SO OBVIOUS THERE IS NO MEANING BEHIND IT CUZ LIKE, IT DOESNT SOUND LIKE HIS FIRST RECORDS ANYMORE" when it's OBVIOUS that there is the same thought and meaning in there as always. It's just not about society anymore, and I don't see how anyone can truly blame him for that.
Or "HE'S LOST HIS TALENT BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE THIS RECORD" which is just nonsense because all it's a matter of is personal taste anyway.

Manson hasn't lost his talent. It just has a different means and a different place in his life. So no, he isn't "washed up" just because he isn't pissing parents off anymore and it's ridiculous that that would even be a requirement for you to enjoy a band. You're just a stupid fucking teenager who wants everyone to be as miserable as you are, but being pissed off doesn't even serve a damn purpose unless you are going to use that anger in a positive way in order to make a positive difference in your own life: Like Manson did. If you want another Antichrist Superstar who shits on religion then have the balls to be one yourself, be the change you want to see in the world. You can't fucking expect that from anyone else. Don't fucking complain that other people aren't obeying your every single desire. They aren't there to satisfy you and you don't have a right to decide what they should do with their lives. You can only control yourself.

People nag about how Manson isn't relevant. Well, do you think he WANTS to be relevant? Or do you think he wants to do what makes him happy? That is, art that is personal to him, meaningful to him and channels his own emotions. I like that he does that. Because I am a person. I am an individual. I am not a fucking teenager stereotype who needs a musician to assure me that what I say and feel is genuine and has a right to exist.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

I didn't have an opinion about Miley Cyrus before.

I didn't have an opinion about Miley Cyrus before. Because nothing about her interested me. She was just a girl making music that isn't my type. You see, that's the difference between me and the rest of humanity. (which is made out of complete dumbasses) When I don't like a certain kind of music, I don't force myself to listen to it. So I won't suffer the "YouTube Retard Syndrome" where a person for some inexplicable reason looks up a music video by someone they hate just so they can say that they hate them. I just don't fuck with MTV bullshit. I don't listen to Lady Gaga, I don't listen to Justin Bieber, I don't listen to Miley Cyrus, and that's why you'll never see me complain about them. I don't see why anyone would.

Even when I defended Miss Cyrus in a previous post I didn't have an opinion about her. I defended her because the way people act about her VMA performance is disgusting and should go into the hall of fame of hypocritical idiocy. I didn't defend her because I liked her performance or her music.

But now, I like her. I think she is awesome. For two reasons
1. She is pissing stupid people off.
2. This video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=My2FRPA3Gf8

IT WAS RELEASED YESTERDAY AND IT HAS 23'160'472 VIEWS, 141'114 THUMBS DOWN. LOOK AT THOSE MOTHERFUCKIN STATS. THEY ARE INSANE AND THEY WILL ONLY GET HIGHER AND HIGHER.

She is a fucking genius. Both "We Can't Stop" and "Wrecking Ball" are breaking VEVO records. I can't have anything but respect for a person who exploits the stupidity of the masses in order to put themselves above everyone else. She is becoming rich and famous off of other peoples stupidity. Every single person who is freaking out about her is furthering her career, just like Marilyn Manson made his career off of freaked-out Christians. And isn't that the ideal? If you can't change the stupidity of the world: Use it.

Her new video is artistic, sensitive, delightful. It is strong, a surprising contrast to what she did at the VMA's. I don't like modern music. But I think that I can definitely grow to appreciate this song. It, at least, has substance. But of course very few people actually notice that. Most people are concerned with things like "Put some clothes on Miley, why do you have to be a slut?"

The stupidity of the masses never fails to amaze me. A girl who is naked is automatically something bad? Im not going to explain why that is a disgusting notion degrading towards all human beings. The nudity in this video is tasteful and has a artistic purpose. Im not going to act like I can say it better than anyone else so Im going to post this pic where fans summarize.



































Let's be honest, the only reason why people dislike her new song is because of what she did at the VMA's. Yes, it was tasteless. But this music video isn't. In fact, it isn't much different than anything else that I see with any other artist when it comes to nudity. It's not anything special in that sense. And yet the slut-shaming is in full effect.

The general public truly is a heap of brainwashed shit. And she must have known what she was doing all along. It's odd to think that someone wouldn't be conscious of their image as a Disney icon and what most likely happens when you do weird naked shit: Controversy. People are freaking out right now. But will they be freaking out 20 years from now, when we've learned to stop hating female sexuality? I can't see how Miley has done anything wrong. All I see is people who can't handle a woman being naked and acting sexual.

I've seen people say that what she did is tasteless. Well yeah, I don't think her performance at the VMA was anything BUT tasteless. It wasn't sexy, it felt like it was "too much". But do you see me condemning her entire value as a human being through her vagina? No. 
I say "I didn't find it attractive."
 I don't say "SHE IS A WORTHLESS WHORE, A SLUT, A HOOKER, SHE SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO EXPRESS HER SEXUALITY THE WAY SHE WANTS AND NOW HER BODY IS TAINTED, ESPECIALLY SINCE SHE WORKED FOR DISNEY BEFORE. WHAT HAPPENED TO MY WHITE CHRISTIAN VIRGIN? I WANT MY CHILDREN TO BE WHITE CHRISTIAN VIRGINS. FOREVER."

There is a difference between not liking something and simply slut-shaming someone. And what the general public is doing is slut-shaming. Apparently almost every single person in society has a Madonna/Whore-complex, even young girls and middle-aged mothers. They are shocked by what Miley is doing. Not because of what she is actually doing. But because she used to be a Disney star. They know her as "That white wholesome girl who never EVER thought about sex, which made her into a good person, and her farts smelled like roses because girls aren't human beings like men, they are fairy tales."
That's what I see everyone saying. "We grew up with that innocent girl and now she is acting like a disgusting whore". 

Well, do you see what the problem is here? It is the assumption that a girl doesn't have a sexuality. And with that assumption comes the value that the less a girl knows about sex, the better of a person she is. The better a girl is at hiding her sexual thoughts/urges, the more valuable she is as a human being. The term "innocent" is ridiculous. 

Definition: Uncorrupted by evil, malice, or wrongdoing; sinless

Miley didn't go on stage and exterminate an ethnic group, she didn't rob someone, she didn't grab a woman and forcefully inserted a bottle into her vagina, she didn't abuse anyone and despite the jokes a witty stupid fuck with no arguments will be compelled to make: She did not give anyone a trauma. 

What did she do? She went up on stage and danced. She shaked her ass and rubbed herself against another guy who wanted it to happen. So. What is this "lack of innocence" that you speak of? What is this evil and wrongdoing? What is this sin? Oh. So that's what it is? You mean to tell me that sex is evil and wrong? I did not know that. In my entire life I have always enjoyed sex. I never saw it as something that ruins lives. I saw it as something pretty that you share with people you like. And something that varies for people. Some like sex THIS way and some like it THAT way, everyone has different needs and ways of expressing their sexuality. I don't really mind any of them. I was under the impression that everyone enjoyed sex?

But that could be because I am a guy. And as such, different rules apply. I can't be slut-shamed. I can't recieve criticism for my amount of sexual partners. Despite the fact that my urges are the same as any woman's, people see me as a hunter. The more people I have sex with, the higher my status in society is. Im so glad that Im not a girl. Because if I was, I wouldn't be allowed to talk about/do a fraction of the shit that I do in my male shell. And that is very unfair to me. Because I am pretty sure that girls like sex just as much as I do. And I think it's terrible that they should be shamed for anything pertaining to sexual activity.

Sex is evil when it comes to girls. And really, what all this Miley Cyrus business is about, is the morality of religion. Her fans are most likely the same kind of people who used to protest outside of Marilyn Manson's concerts in the 1990's. People who think a "good girl" is supposed to do well in school, never fuck anyone, be quiet when the men are talking and always be more responsible than what any guy is. A good girl isn't supposed to act like a human being. 

Well, I would like to see a world where "good girl" entails a person who is confident in themselves and do their own thing, don't let others push them down, stands up for gender equality and justice, treats other people with respect and makes sure to feel good about themselves and feel good about life. Not a prisoner in their gender and other peoples ridiculous expectations. I would like to see the definition of a "good girl" be "someone who doesn't take shit from bigots". And I think Miley is on the right path.

On a different note, I've seen black people become upset about her VMA appearence because she "uses black people as props" and "steals their culture" by shaking her ass. Are you serious? Black people must have the most retarded fucking culture ever. Black people pride themselves on being uneducated (EBONICS) , criminal (BEING A REAL NIGGA WHO STANDS UP AGAINST THE WHITE MAN) and men having babies that they don't take care of. And now, they claim that the act of shaking ones ass is their "culture"? Get the fuck over yourselves. What is there worth claiming copyright over?

If white people made sure "not to steal black culture" then we wouldn't have had Elvis. Or Rolling Stones, Janis Joplin, The Doors. Nine Inch Nails wouldn't exist because Metal music and Rock 'n' Roll wouldn't have existed. It's odd how there are black people claiming that their culture is "holy" and "shouldn't be mixed with whitie" and that they don't seem to realize how much they sound like the fucking KKK when it comes to their views on mixing culture. Just shut the fuck up and stop seeing everything out of skin colour.

I don't see a problem with her behavior and her music. I see a bigger problem with parents telling their female children "You don't have a sexuality, don't ever express it or bad things will happen and you'll deserve it". What makes the world a better place? Intolerance towards our human nature? Or accepting our human nature for both genders?